Legal Opinion

State v. Kotsimpulos

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 12, 1980PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

After trial by jury, Peter Kotsimpulos was convicted of the crime of theft (17-A M.R.S.A. § 353) of five pork tenderloins from the Hannaford Brothers meat plant in South Portland. The sole issue raised by Kotsimpulos on appeal is the exclusion of evidence of the expressed desire of a Han-naford Brothers supervisor to see that the defendant was relieved of his duties as a federal meat inspector. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

The evidence at trial revealed that police officers had established surveillance at the plant because of unexplained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Eaton v. SontagSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. SaucierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. State v. BerubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. DechaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. State v. LeClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. ConlogueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API