Legal Opinion

State v. Rouson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 2013No. COA12-382PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where defendant has failed to bring forth a meritorious argument or reveal error in the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress and in the acceptance of his guilty pleas on the charges of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine and possession of a stolen firearm, we deny defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari.

In Martin County Superior Court, on 5 August 2008, defendant was indicted on two counts of possession with intent to sell and deliver a controlled substance and possession of a stolen firearm. Defendant filed two motions to suppress: the first, on 8…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. United States v. John Eldon Beck, United States of America v. John W. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Kelly v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Kelly v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. EstebanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API