Legal Opinion
Moses v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 2008No. Civil Action 01-2528 (PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Vijayakumar Moses brought this suit against his former employer, Howard University Hospital (“Howard”), alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C. Code §§ 2-1401 et seq. (“DCHRA”). The case has been pending for some time and, on February 12, 2007, the Court granted Howard’s motion for summary judgment on all claims except plaintiffs claim that he was unlawfully retaliated against when Howard terminated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moses v. Howard University HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kopff v. World Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Moses v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Ferring Pharm., Inc. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.