Legal Opinion
Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy Manne
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 11, 2002No. 586PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
In an interference over a new assay to identify anti-cancer compounds, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) awarded priority to Mariano Bar-bacid and Veeraswamy Manne (collectively Barbacid) over Michael Brown, Joseph Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss (collectively Brown). Because the Board did not consider evidence that Brown conceived the invention before Barbacid reduced it to practice and diligently pursued the invention from the time of Barbacid’s reduction to practice through Brown’s filing date, this court vacates…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina v. Herve Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain CommerconCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Arjun Singh v. Anthony J. BrakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Christopher J. Stevens v. Shigeru TamaiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and Yuval Reiss v. Mariano Barbacid and Veeraswamy ManneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.