Legal Opinion

Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1979No. ERB C-147- 77, CA 11356, SC 26033PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff, a state employe, filed a complaint with the Employment Relations Board (ERB) charging petitioner union and the University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, her employer, with an unfair labor practice following their application to her of the union security provisions contained in their collective bargaining agreement. ERB found the provisions invalid and held that certain actions taken pursuant to them constituted an unfair labor practice within the meaning of ORS 243.672(1)(c). The union sought judicial review in the Court of Appeals, which affirmed ERB’s order. 37 Or App 707, 588…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Oregon State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lane County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Stevens v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Bates v. Portland Federation of Teachers & Classified EmployeesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Carlson v. AFSCMECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API