Legal Opinion
Bates v. Portland Federation of Teachers & Classified Employees
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 6, 1991No. UP-6-87; CA A62212PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioner Portland Federation of Teachers and Classified Employees (Union) is the exclusive bargaining agent for employees of Portland School District 1J (District).1 It seeks review of an Employment Relations Board (ERB) order determining that the “fair share” provision in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement is invalid under ORS 243.650(10) and is not otherwise valid as a union security provision. We affirm.
Union and District negotiated a collective bargaining agreement effective from August 23, 1984, through June 30, 1987, which included this provision:
“Article 8
“PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Stevens v. Oregon Public Employees UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BarberMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016