Legal Opinion

Oleszek v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1922No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to Wayne; Houghton (Samuel G.), J., presiding. Case by Joseph Oleszek against the Ford Motor Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On September 15, 1916, the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant at its plant in Highland Park, while cleaning an oily, greasy floor, slipped and fell, dislodging an iron pipe which in its fall struck and injured his right leg a few inches above the shoe top. The extent to which there was an abrasion of the skin does not appear. He was removed by his fellow workmen to a first-aid room provided by defendant, in the plant. Two young men, selected by the doctors, in charge of this room and employed by defendant, applied treatment to the wound, after which plaintiff resumed work, being assigned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Cook v. Charles Hoertz & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Adams v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Reiss v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Polucha v. LandesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API