Legal Opinion
State v. Keeney
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1996No. CC 92-05-1143, 92-05-1144, 92-05-1146, 92-03-0630 CA A78976 SC S41492, SC S41495, SC S41497, SC S41498, SC S41499, SC S41555PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Defendants are charged with conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance, conspiracy to possess a controlled substance, and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, in violation of ORS 161.450 and 475.992. The trial court suppressed evidence of those crimes that was seized pursuant to four search warrants. The court found that several sworn statements of the affiant, made in support of the state’s warrant applications, were untruthful. The state appealed the suppression order, ORS 138.060(3), and the Court of Appeals reversed. State v. Keeney, 128 Or App 211, 875 P2d 539 (1994). On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CastillejaOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.