Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Creek & Indiana Development Co.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1921No. 2596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Pearl Chisholm and others against the Creek & Indiana Development Company and others. Finding for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The following questions are essential for determination:(1) Was it necesary for the wife to join with the husband in the modification and extending or renewal of the oil and gas mining lease on the part of the husband, the original having been executed prior to their marriage, and the homestead status having attached subsequent to such original execution, but prior to the execution of such modifying and extending or renewing instrument, both instruments having been approved by the Secretary of the Interior?(2) Are the plaintiffs estopped from setting up the failure of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Goudy v. MeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Montant Ex Rel. Haire v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. McCray v. Miller &8212 Bland v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Molone v. WamsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Garret v. GetzendanerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Harrison v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API