Legal Opinion
MacKey v. Shalala
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 26, 1999No. Civ.A. AW-97-324PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Each party has opposed the other’s respective motion, and replied accordingly. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion in part, and grant it in part, and deny Plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND
From 1980 to 1984, Plaintiff, Billie Bryan Mackey, had been the Director of the National Digestive Diseases…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amirmokri v. AbrahamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Venugopal v. Shire LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Howard v. Blalock Electric Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Langerman v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- O'BRIEN v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.