Legal Opinion
Langerman v. Thompson
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 17, 2001No. Civil Action 99-3011PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Pending and ready for resolution in the employment discrimination action are Plaintiff and Defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Samuel M. Langerman, brings sex and race discrimination claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) against Defendant the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”). No hearing is deemed necessary, and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the court shall GRANT Defendant’s motion and DENY Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adams v. Calvert County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Sonpon v. Grafton School, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Alston v. State of Maryland Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Alston v. State of Maryland Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.