Legal Opinion
Young v. General Services Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 1, 2000No. Civil Action 99-671-(EGS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Donald and Diane Young, James Burke, and Charles E. Smith Realty L.P. (“Smith Realty”) [hereinafter “plaintiffs”] commenced this lawsuit to enjoin defendants General Services Administration (“GSA”) and United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) [hereinafter “the government”] from awarding a contract to defendant-intervenor LCOR Alexandria L.L.C. [hereinafter “LCOR”] to develop the government’s proposed project to consolidate PTO facilities in Alexandria, Virginia. Plaintiffs claim that the government has failed to comply…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Duckworth v. United States Ex Rel. LockeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Reed v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Oceana v. Bureau of Ocean Energy ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.