Legal Opinion
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 1, 1988No. CX-88-1044PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID R. LESLIE, Judge.
Daniel Karst appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of F.C. Hayer Co., Inc., on claims for disability discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (1986), and Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(6) (1986). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant, Daniel Karst, has been employed as a warehouseman for F.C. Hayer since 1953. He incurred two work-related shoulder injuries in the course of his employment. The first injury, in 1979, resulted in lost time from work and a permanent partial disability rating. He returned to work in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortgage BankingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000