Legal Opinion

Imperial Cattle Co. v. Imperial Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1985No. Civ. 28376PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Defendant Imperial Irrigation District (the District) appeals a judgment entered after a jury found it liable to plaintiff Imperial Cattle Company on theories of inverse condemnation and nuisance for approximately $192,000 in damages arising from the flooding of Imperial Cattle’s feedlot in 1976 and 1977. Except to the extent that the trial court improperly calculated the amount of prejudgment interest due on the damage award, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Imperial Cattle operates a cattle feedlot next to the northern edge of the City of Imperial. The feedlot is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Jones v. DumrichobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Bunch v. Coachella Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API