Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1999No. M1995-00011-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether dentures constitute “foreign matter” requiring invalidation of a breath-alcohol test result and to consider whether the admission of a breath-alcohol test result must be challenged by a pretrial motion under Tenn. R.Crim. P. 12(b)(3) or whether an objection may be made at trial.

After a jury-out hearing, the trial court concluded that the presence of dentures did not preclude admission of the breath-alcohol test result. The defendant was thereafter convicted of driving under the influence of an intoxicant.

The Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SensingTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States v. John R. Barletta, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. State v. RandolphCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  4. United States v. Miguel Gomez-BenabeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Farr v. Director of Revenue State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. State v. ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. State v. TomNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Eldridge v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API