Legal Opinion
State v. Arnold
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 11, 2002No. W2001-01450-CCA-R3-CDPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · WellesDavid H. Welles, J.
in which GARY R. WADE, P.J., and DAVID G. HAYES, J., joined.
The Defendant, Harold D. Arnold, pled guilty to driving under the influence of an intoxicant and failure to maintain an accurate log book after the trial court denied his motion to suppress the results of a breath analysis test. The Defendant properly reserved a certified question of law for this Court to determine whether the trial court erred in denying the Defendant’s motion to suppress. 1 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
On March 28, 2000, Deputies Marc By-rum and David Watts responded to a call concerning a…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SensingTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. EdisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CookTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. McCaslinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- State v. DeloitCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- State of Tennessee v. Chad Nicholas HaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. David M. Whitman, Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- State of Tennessee v. Howard B. HigleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- State of Tennessee v. John WhittingtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.