Legal Opinion
City of Anaheim v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1981No. Civ. 25724PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.
We granted the petition of the City of Anaheim (City) to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) awarding David A. Brazz (the applicant) a penalty for serious and wilful misconduct (Lab. Code, § 4553) based on the Board’s finding that City violated Labor Code section 132a 1 which prohibits employers from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee because the employee has filed an application for benefits with the Board.
City contends, inter alia, that section 132a is inapplicable to the facts of this case and that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aguilar v. Association for Retarded CitizensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Gonzales & Co., Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Barns v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Keyes Motors, Inc. v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Klee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.