Legal Opinion

United Farm Agency, Inc. v. Niemuth

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1970No. 210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

We affirm the order of the circuit court. The remedy of summary judgment is provided by sec. 270.635, Stats. That statute reads in pertinent part:

“270.635 Summary judgments. (1) Summary judgment may be entered as provided in this section in any civil action or special proceeding. Notice of motion for summary judgment and the papers in support thereof shall be served within 40 days after issue is joined, subject to enlargement of time as provided in s. 269.45.
“(2) The judgment may be entered in favor of either party, on motion, upon the affidavit of any person who has knowledge thereof,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Schuster v. Germantown Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McConnell v. L. C. L. Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Wozniak v. Local 1111 of the United Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taterka v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Riley Construction Co. v. Schillmoeller & Krofl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. American Orthodontics Corp. v. G & H Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API