Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1977No. 75-629Published

1DissentAbrahamson, J.

I would affirm the trial court’s order denying the motions for summary judgment for the reasons set forth in American Orthodontics Corp. v. G & H Insurance Agency, Inc., 77 Wis. 2d 337, 253 N.W.2d 82 (1977), and the cases cited therein. Especially relevant is our language in United Farm Agency, Inc. v. Niemuth, 47 Wis.2d 1, 7, 8, 176 N.W.2d 328 (1970) :

“. . . Where a decision on a point of law not previously decided in this state is at issue, the trial judge has the discretion to make that decision only after he is satisfied that all relevant facts have been placed in evidence. While certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Orthodontics Corp. v. G & H Insurance Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United Farm Agency, Inc. v. NiemuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API