Legal Opinion

Walker v. Bahnsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1923No. 14530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was a motion to the court helow of plaintiff in error for judgment on the mandate and opinion of this court rendered in case No. 10860, April 10, 1923, hence the second time the same parties have ibeen 'before this court in controversies g'rowing out of the same original transaction. In the former case, No'. 10860, the parties were in reverse position in this court, John E. Bahnsen being plaintiff in error, and E. H. Walker, defendant in error. Walker, plaintiff .in error in the instant case, had recovered a judgment in the trial court in the former case, and Bahnsem appealed, and in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burden v. SheridanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  2. Bahnsen v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Carlock v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Wagner v. EarpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API