Legal Opinion

Bahnsen v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1923No. 10860PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a suit in equity to enforce the specific performance of an oral contract pertaining to real estate,. commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be called plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

Upon trial to the court there was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, as prayed for, to reverse which this proceeding in' error was commenced.

The first ground for reversal relied upon, and the only one we deem it necessary to notice, is stated by counsel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burden v. SheridanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  2. Winemiller v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Ewert v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Hall v. HaerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. St. Louis Trading Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API