Legal Opinion

Lanna v. Konen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The named defendant and her husband, Paul, were on December 13th, 1933, living together in a dwelling-house on premises known as 592 Ardale Street, West Haven, the legal title to which stood in the name of the wife, and both defendants were in possession and control thereof. About two years previous to the date named, Paul purchased an overgrown, large-sized mongrel dog, apparently part german police and part collie. The household duties were performed by the wife without servants, and when the husband worked he was away from home early in the morning to the middle of the afternoon. The dog…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quilty v. . BattieNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Camp v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  3. McClain ex rel. McClain v. Lewiston Interstate Fair & Racing Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McCarthy v. DaunisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Wood v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Hancock v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Barber v. HochstrasserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  5. Murphy v. BuonatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API