Legal Opinion
Eatoni Ergonomics, Inc. v. Research in Motion Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 2011No. 08 Civ. 10079 (WHP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Plaintiff Eatoni Ergonomics, Inc. (“Eatoni”) amends its complaint against Defendants Research In Motion Corporation and Research In Motion Ltd. (collectively, “RIM”) to assert exclusively violations of § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and New York’s Donnelly Act, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 340. RIM moves to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, RIM’s motion to dismiss is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
This motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solidfx, LLC v. Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Dial Corp. v. News Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Reiss v. Audible Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- United States of America v. Google LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023