Smith v. Blackmore
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. "William H.' Barnes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
The record in this case is defective. No bill of exceptions, statement of facts, or motion for new trial appears therein. There was signed by the attorneys of record, and filed among the papers copied into the transcript, a paper purporting to be an agreed statement of the case and facts proven at the trial, permitted under paragraph 874 of the Revised Statutes. This paper was probably meant to take the place of both a bill of exceptions and a statement of facts. It embodied some of the characteristics of a bill of exceptions; and, under the authority of Putnam v. Putnam, ante, p. 182, 24…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
- Molina v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Romero v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Tombstone v. ReillyArizona Supreme Court · 1893
- Clark v. HolcombArizona Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.