City of Tombstone v. Reilly
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Richard E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.
As appears from the record the hill of ex- , ceptions was not allowed by the judge of the court, as required by paragraph 828 of the Revised Statutes. Nor is there any^ statement of facts approved and signed by the judge. There is a stipulation by the. parties “that the statement of facts herein shown to have been agreed to by respective counsel was thereafter settled, found correct, and signed as such by the judge, and by him approved, as prescribed by paragraph 843.” Paragraph 843 provides that if the parties or their attorneys agree upon a statement of facts they shall sign the same, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. BlackmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Liberty Mining & Smelting Co. v. GeddesArizona Supreme Court · 1907
- Molina v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Romero v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Abraham v. Roland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927