Sumner v. Pruitt
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Justice:
This appeal is from an order granting Dr. Pruitt’s motion for a directed verdict in a medical malpractice suit brought by-appellant Donna Sumner. We affirm because there is no evidence from which a jury might reasonably conclude Dr. Pruitt was negligent.
Mrs. Sumner contends Dr. Pruitt violated customary standards of practice by failing either to insert an intra-uterine device (IUD) during menstruation or to conduct a laboratory pregnancy test before insertion. The evidence of his failure to do either, she argues, was sufficient proof of negligence to require submission of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Mullis v. ChaikaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Moody v. McLellanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Cogdill v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Logan v. GattiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986