Legal Opinion

Sumner v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1984No. 0069PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Justice:

This appeal is from an order granting Dr. Pruitt’s motion for a directed verdict in a medical malpractice suit brought by-appellant Donna Sumner. We affirm because there is no evidence from which a jury might reasonably conclude Dr. Pruitt was negligent.

Mrs. Sumner contends Dr. Pruitt violated customary standards of practice by failing either to insert an intra-uterine device (IUD) during menstruation or to conduct a laboratory pregnancy test before insertion. The evidence of his failure to do either, she argues, was sufficient proof of negligence to require submission of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Mullis v. ChaikaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Fontaine v. PeitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Moody v. McLellanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Cogdill v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Logan v. GattiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API