Legal Opinion

Green v. Lilliewood

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 11, 1978No. 20834PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This appeal is from an order granting Dr. Lilliewood’s motion for a directed verdict in a medical malpractice suit brought by appellant Mary Green. We reverse.

In July 1969, the respondent, Dr. Lilliewood, inserted an intrauterine device designed to prevent pregnancy into Ms. Green’s uterus. In October 1969, Ms. Green complained to Dr. Lilliewood of intermenstrual bleeding and abdominal cramps. She testified she had no problems prior to the insertion of the IUD, but that after its insertion, she developed heavy vaginal discharge and abdominal pain. Although Dr. Lilliewood treated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jarboe v. HartingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  2. Console v. NickouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Chaney v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Robertson v. LaCroixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Armstrong Ex Rel. Estate of Armstrong v. WeilandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bramlette Ex Rel. Estate of Bramlette v. Charter-Medical-ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Clark v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API