Legal Opinion

Stifter v. Hartman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1923No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Prior to the 21st day of June A. D. 1920, Charles J. Stifter, the plaintiff, held a lease of a certain office in a building in Detroit. He subleased one-half of this office to the defendant. This suit was brought to collect rent from defendant for a period of four months. Upon the trial in the circuit court at the close of the testimony both parties requested a directed verdict. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and stated his reasons for doing so as follows:

“In the month of June, 1920, defendant came to the plaintiff, Charles J. Stifter, and discussed with him the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GaertnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Smith v. MaxeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Brandt v. VanderveenMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Stimac v. WissmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bookstein v. DragunaitisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wilson v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API