Stifter v. Hartman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Prior to the 21st day of June A. D. 1920, Charles J. Stifter, the plaintiff, held a lease of a certain office in a building in Detroit. He subleased one-half of this office to the defendant. This suit was brought to collect rent from defendant for a period of four months. Upon the trial in the circuit court at the close of the testimony both parties requested a directed verdict. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and stated his reasons for doing so as follows:
“In the month of June, 1920, defendant came to the plaintiff, Charles J. Stifter, and discussed with him the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. GaertnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. MaxeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Brandt v. VanderveenMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Stimac v. WissmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Bookstein v. DragunaitisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Wilson v. BishopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926