Legal Opinion

United States v. William Nieves and Edgar Edward Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 31, 1971No. 1046, 1047, Dockets 71-1290, 71-1279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants Nieves and Acosta appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon a jury verdict in the Southern District of New York, Frederick vP. Bryan, District Judge, finding them guilty of three counts of selling cocaine without an order form, in violation of the federal narcotics laws, 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1964). 1 The only claim on ap peal worthy of mention is the refusal of the trial judge to submit the issue of entrapment to the jury. 2 Finding no error, we affirm.

Pursuant to what has come to be accepted as routine practice in the enforcement of the federal narcotics laws, Nieves and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Benjamin IndiviglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. David Ross MileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Irving Braver and Morton LehrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Frank Licursi, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Richard AngladaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API