Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Anglada

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 16, 1975No. 229, Docket 75-1226PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue on this appeal by Richard Anglada from a conviction for violating the narcotics laws is whether the trial judge erred in refusing to submit the issue of entrapment to the jury. We hold that he did, and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

According to the Government, the evidence in this case showed a typical narcotics transaction. Detective Ralph Nieves testified that on September 3, 1974, he went with a confidential informant, Carlos Santana, to negotiate with one Edward Torres to buy some heroin. Price and place of delivery were agreed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. David Ross MileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Walter RileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Arthur OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Ivan Melchor Moreno and Rigoberto Melchor MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Milford Burkley, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API