Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Gildea

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Probate Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBrazee, J.

The defendants in error were the plaintiffs below, and declared in assumpsit upon common counts for work, labor and services, laying their damages at $1,500. The plea was the general issue. The cause was tried by the court, a jury being expressly waived. The court found for the plaintiffs below $953.50, for which judgment was given with costs.

The evidence shows a parol contract between the plaintiffs and defendants, by which the plaintiffs below agreed *16to buy for the defendants the brick in constructing the walls of a building three stories high, including the basement, according to a ground…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. French v. . NewNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Jackson ex dem. Edson v. GagerNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  4. Meade v. M'DowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812
  5. Pike v. NashNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  2. Borquez v. Robert C. Ozer, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Fehringer v. F. H. Martin Drug Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Borquez v. Robert C. Ozer, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API