Legal Opinion
Borquez v. Robert C. Ozer, PC
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1996No. 93CA1805Published
1Opinion of the Court
923 P.2d 166 (1995)
Robert P. BORQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT C. OZER, P.C. d/b/a Ozer and Mullen, P.C. and Robert C. Ozer, individually, Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees.
No. 93CA1805.
Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.
November 9, 1995.
Rehearing Denied December 7, 1995.
Certiorari Granted September 16, 1996.
Roger Moore, Denver, Lance E. Isaac, Denver (On the Opening Brief); Collins & Pringle, Dwight L. Pringle, Denver, Robert P. Borquez, Denver, for Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Ozer, Sokolow & Ruppert, P.C., Renee C. Ozer, Denver, for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.