Legal Opinion
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 12, 2008No. C.A. No. 04-1371-JJFPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion For Remitter [sic], Judgment As A Matter Of Law, Or, In The Alternative, New Trial Concerning Damages (D.I. 613) filed by Defendants, Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation (collectively, “Fair-child”). For the reasons set forth below the Court will grant the Motion to the extent that it requests a remittitur and reduce the amount of damages awarded to Power Integrations to $6,116,720.58, an amount representing 82% of the jury’s damages verdict.
BACKGROUND
The background…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Laymon v. Lobby House, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- ZF MERITOR LLC v. Eaton Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Card-Monroe Corp. v. Tuftco Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Lg Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.