Legal Opinion
Lg Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 16, 2010No. Civil Action 06-726-JJF, 07-357-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
These proceedings involve three related patent infringement cases involving 23 patents. In the first-filed action, LG Display Co., Ltd. (“LGD”) alleges infringement of nine asserted patents (collectively, the “LGD Patents”) against AU Optronics Corporation (“AUO”) and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation (“CMO”). AUO and CMO have also brought separate actions against LGD and LG Display America, Inc. (“LGD America”) alleging infringement of eight patents asserted by AUO and six patents asserted by CMO.
Proceedings with respect to CMO have been stayed. The Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Titan Atlas Manufacturing, Inc. v. SiskDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012