Legal Opinion

Piston v. Hughes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.:

• Keith A. Hughes and Sherri L. Campbell (“Appellants”), husband and wife, appeal from the Judgment entered by the trial court against them and in favor of Robert W. Piston and Kathy M. Piston (collectively, “the Pistons”). The Pistons have filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s admission of certain evidence during the bench trial. Upon review, we affirm the Judgment entered by the trial court.

In its Opinion, the trial court briefly summarized the dispute underlying the instant appeal as follows:

[The Pistons] purchased their 43 acres of unimproved vacant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. SzymanskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Flannery v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Recreation Land Corp. v. HartzfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Zuk v. ZukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gruca, R. v. Clearbrook CommunitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Waller Corp. v. Warren Plaza, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Est. of Hayes, R. v. Coatesville HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Gruca, R. v. Clearbrook CommunitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. J. Ream v. PA DPWCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API