Legal Opinion

Luyster v. Gober

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided November 20, 2000No. 99-1271PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On August 29, 2000, this Court affirmed a May 5, 1999, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision which had denied as not well grounded the appellant’s claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disability, other than a corneal scar of the left eye and scars under both eye lids. The Court’s decision was based upon the Board’s determination that the record contained no competent medical nexus evidence. On September 19, 2000, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion pursuant to Rule 35(b) of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure for a panel decision revoking the Court’s…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  2. Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Littke v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. Drosky v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Holliday v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  2. Larry G. Tyrues v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  3. Pedro P. Duenas v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
  4. Williams v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
  5. Shoffner v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API