Pedro P. Duenas v. Anthony J. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court is PER CURIAM. HAGEL, Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
2Per curiam
Pedro P. Dueñas, who is unrepresented, appeals a May 13, 2003, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board denied his claims for service connection for (1) a urinary tract infection, (2) poor vision, (3) a hearing-loss disability, (4) a gastrointestinal disorder, (5) asthma, (6) bronchitis, (7) emphysema, (8) heart disease, and (9) hypertension. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a) and 7266(a) to review the May *5142003 Board decision. For the following reasons, the Court…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- McLendon v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Ray A. Mc Clain v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Hal H. Locklear v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Robert L. Trafter v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- D ENNIS L. W ASHINGTON v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.