Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1939No. 11395PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff and against the United States. The parties will be designated hereinafter as in the court below.
The suit was brought under the provisions of the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20). The petition is in two counts, one on an express contract, and one in quantum meruit, to recover the sum of $2,354.84, claimed as the balance due on the rental of certain equipment for use by the Soil Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture. A general denial to each of the counts was interposed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bruner v. WheatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stokes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc. v. Michael Oppenstein, Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc., and Berkson Brothers, Inc. v. Michael OppensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Thrift Shop, Inc. v. Alaska Mutual Savings BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.