Legal Opinion

Salgado v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1999No. S065021PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK,

J. This matter involves the application of Code of Civil Procedure section 667.7 and Civil Code section 3333.2, both of which were enacted as part of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA). The former provision requires the superior court, at the request of either party, to order that an award for future damages exceeding $50,000 in an action against a health care provider be paid on a periodic basis rather than in a lump sum. The latter provision places a cap of $250,000 on the liability of a health care provider, in an action based on professional negligence, for an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Braddock v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Joseph Oliveri v. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. And Crowley Maritime Corp., and Third-Party v. Midland-Ross Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Atkins v. StrayhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Lopez v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  3. People v. PanganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Esparza v. Skyreach Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Deocampo v. AhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API