People v. Pangan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a driving under the influence with injury case (Veh. Code, § 23153) in which the .trial judge’s conscientious and painstaking calculation of a restitution award failed to take into account the time value of money. When the court computed the value of the victim’s $246.50 per month in pension benefits, it multiplied that monthly benefit by a calculated likely lifespan and ordered a payment of $70,000. Defense counsel did not object, and defendant was hit with a restitution order that overstates the victim’s actual economic loss by,thousands…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. FoalimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- People v. WasbottenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.