Legal Opinion

People v. Pangan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2013No. G046491PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a driving under the influence with injury case (Veh. Code, § 23153) in which the .trial judge’s conscientious and painstaking calculation of a restitution award failed to take into account the time value of money. When the court computed the value of the victim’s $246.50 per month in pension benefits, it multiplied that monthly benefit by a calculated likely lifespan and ordered a payment of $70,000. Defense counsel did not object, and defendant was hit with a restitution order that overstates the victim’s actual economic loss by,thousands…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. FoalimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. State v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. People v. WasbottenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. State v. JamiesonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API