Sun Insurance Office v. Scott
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
The respondent- instituted five, actions in a common pleas court in Ohio on as many policies of fire insurance. The causes were removed' to the District Court for Southern Ohio, where they were consolidated, tried together, and resulted in verdicts and judgments for respondent. On appeal two of.these judgments were reversed, and the three here under review were affirmed. We granted certiorari.
Each suit seeks recovery upon a fire policy issued upon wool belonging to respondent. In each, defense was made that he placed a chattel mortgage on the property in violation of a provision of the policy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bates v. Equitable InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hunt v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by45 opinions
- Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, and United States of America v. Lyles & Lang Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Fountain & Herrington, Inc. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Stuart v. National Indemnity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.