Legal Opinion
Yreka Mining & Milling Co. v. Knight
California Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1901No. Sac. No. 804PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Injunction. Plaintiff alleges in its complaint that it is, and for six years last past has been, the owner in possession, and entitled to the possession, of certain three quartz-mining claims situated in Siskiyou County,—to wit, The Ada, Flora Blanche, and Ohio; that the mines are contiguous, extending in the same direction, forming one continuous mining claim, four thousand five hundred feet in length and six hundred feet in width, all containing valuable quartz rock bearing gold; that on January 2, 1899, defendant wrongfully entered upon a part of the Ada and a part of the Flora…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- De Noon v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Anvil Hydraulic & Drainage Co. v. CodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Ring v. United States Gypsum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Lucky Five Mining Co. v. Central Idaho Placer Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951