Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Turner v. City of Lewiston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 27, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

On defendant’s exceptions to acceptance of report of Referee. The action (“on the case”), based on Chapter 91, P. L. 1935, is to obtain reimbursement for “extra expense” on account of school conveyance of children of John J. O’Connor, a World War veteran.

It is conceded that O’Connor, during the time involved, had his pauper settlement in the City of Lewiston, but actually resided in the Town of Turner. Since 1930 he and his family had been receiving pauper supplies from the town, for all of which the city had reimbursed it until April 16,1936. On that date an agreement was made, whereby in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Guilford v. Inhabitants of MonsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  2. Inhabitants of Rockport v. Inhabitants of SearsmontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  3. City of Bangor v. Inhabitants of OrnevilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
  4. Inhabitants of Durham v. Inhabitants of LisbonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. Inhabitants of Rockport v. Inhabitants of SearsmontSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steele v. SmalleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  2. Beckett v. RoderickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  3. Maine Central Institute v. Inhabitants of PalmyraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  4. Inhabitants of Town of Amity v. INHABITANTS, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  5. Inhabitants of Sanford v. Inhabitants of HartlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API