Legal Opinion

City of Bangor v. Inhabitants of Orneville

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 24, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On Report. The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehotjse, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover the sums paid by the plaintiff city for the support of Maurice Foley in the insane hospital, including the expenses of his examination and commitment, amounting in the- aggregate to $101.02.

It is admitted that Foley had a legal settlement in the defendant town, that he was adjudged insane by the “board of examiners” of Bangor, and by their authority committed to the insane hospital, and that the expenses sued for were incurred and paid by the plaintiff city. But it is strongly urged that the city is precluded from recovering in this action by reason…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Welles v. BattelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Boston Turnpike Co. v. Town of PomfretSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Mott v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Inhabitants of Turner v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API