Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Sanford v. Inhabitants of Hartland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 23, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

This action of assumpsit, brought to recover money paid for the support of persons having a pauper settlement in the defendant town, was heard by the Justice presiding below without the intervention of a jury and comes to this Court on exceptions duly taken to his decision under right reserved therefor duly entered on the docket. .

The decision excepted to is stated in the words:

“Judgt. for defendant because of failure of notice,”

but the nature of the insufficiency is not declared. A copy of a notice dated May 10, 1941, appears in the record as an Exhibit, and stipulation carries…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Turner v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  2. City of Bath v. Inhabitants of HarpswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of AlnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Inhabitants of the Town of Etna v. Inhabitants of the Town of PlymouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API