Inhabitants of Sanford v. Inhabitants of Hartland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.
This action of assumpsit, brought to recover money paid for the support of persons having a pauper settlement in the defendant town, was heard by the Justice presiding below without the intervention of a jury and comes to this Court on exceptions duly taken to his decision under right reserved therefor duly entered on the docket. .
The decision excepted to is stated in the words:
“Judgt. for defendant because of failure of notice,”
but the nature of the insufficiency is not declared. A copy of a notice dated May 10, 1941, appears in the record as an Exhibit, and stipulation carries…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inhabitants of Turner v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
- City of Bath v. Inhabitants of HarpswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of AlnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Inhabitants of the Town of Etna v. Inhabitants of the Town of PlymouthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966