Legal Opinion

Carr Business Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Chowchilla

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 2008No. F052704PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISEMAN, J.

We hold that a stipulated judicial reference agreement made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 638, which includes a provision to split the referee’s fees equally between the parties, is enforceable and precludes recovery of the prevailing party’s 50 percent share of the referee’s fees as an item of costs.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORIES

This appeal comes after remand in litigation arising out of a contractual dispute between appellant City of Chowchilla (Chowchilla) and respondent Carr Business Enterprises, Inc. (Carr). In December 1999, the parties stipulated that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Webster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lawrence v. Walzer & GabrielsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Winston Square Homeowner's Ass'n v. Centex West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quiles v. Parent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Anthony v. LiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Quiles v. ParentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Zigman-Shields Gen. Contractors v. Kirk Paving CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API