Legal Opinion
Quiles v. Parent
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2018No. G054353APublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 11/02/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE AMANDA QUILES, Plaintiff and Respondent, G054353 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2010-00425532) ARTHUR J. PARENT, JR., OPINION Defendant and Appellant. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Stephen A. Madoni and Stephen A. Madoni for Defendant and Appellant. Bryan Schwartz Law, Bryan J. Schwartz, Logan Starr; Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill and Daniel H. Reiss for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. Diffee Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Boucher v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Premier Medical Management Systems, Inc. v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.