Legal Opinion

Leonardi v. Habermann Provision Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1943No. Nos. 19224, 19225, 19226, 19229, 19230, 19231Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.

The six plaintiffs whose cases were, by the agreement of the-parties, tried together, filed their separate actions against the defendant for damages, each claiming to have been poisoned, by eating pork purchased from the defendant.

One of the plaintiffs, Ben Sanguedolce, testified that he went to-the Central Market in Cleveland and bought a few pounds of pork shoulder from defendant’s’ meat stand (Stand No. 9). He claims to-have taken this meat to his mother-in-law, Mrs. Leonardi, also a plaintiff- in one of the actions, who made the pork into sausages and then prepared them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SnowbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McSpedon v. KunzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Zorger v. Hillman'sAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Dressler v. Merkel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Dressler v. Merkel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API