Legal Opinion
Bagenstose v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 2005No. 04-CV-780PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Appellant, Charles M. Bagenstose, appeals an order of the trial court which denied his petition for review of a decision of the Office of Employee Appeals Board upholding the initial decision of the Office of Employee Appeals (“OEA”) that it lacked jurisdiction to review his reduction-in-force (“RIF”) claim because he had retired rather than be terminated as a result of a RIF. Bagenstose contends that his retirement was involuntary due to duress and misrepresentation. We are unpersuaded by his arguments and affirm.
Bagenstose was formerly a mathematics teacher with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Keyes v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Davis v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Stevens v. QuickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Settlemire v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- District of Columbia Office of Human Rights v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bagenstose v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Smith v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jahr v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.