Legal Opinion
Neiberger v. Hawkins
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 13, 2002No. CIV.A. 99B1120MJWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, patients of the Forensic Institute at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo (“CMHI-P”), bring three surviving claims: (1) violation of Colorado’s Care and Treatment of the Mentally Ill Act; (2) violation of Due Process pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (3) violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Plaintiffs originally brought those claims against Defendants Robert Hawkins (individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the CMHI-P), Garry Toerber (individually and in his official capacity as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Braam Ex Rel. Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- George v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2017